My next Czech novel cover

lovci-monster-4-legie_thumb

This is the first time I’ve seen it Lovci Monster 4 – Legie.

http://www.fantasyplanet.cz/kniha/lovci-monster-4-legie

EDIT: Apparently the Czechs didn’t get the memo from the panty twisted SFWA Social Justice Warrior whiner crowd that this cover is sexist and might hurt somebody’s feelings. πŸ™‚

57 Responses

  1. Heh. That’s awesome. I love how the cover is totally over the top.

  2. I love chi-chi’s myself. That’s what the title means, right?

  3. Distraction armor?

    • I like how all my Czech covers are this sort of bad ass, balls to the wall, big 80s, don’t give a crap, Heavy Metal style. Then you look at my German cover and it is all suited up, understated, and classy. Then my French covers are this retro-cool, stylized artistic look. It says a lot about different target audiences. πŸ™‚

      • I think the standard reply should be, does the cover help push more reader to buy the book? Nowaday, I only buy ebook anyway due to the versatility of the format (hey, I have a very long commute, so I read in between traffic jam and everywhere). So bosom-babe cover never bother me anymore.

      • You should sell a poster with the book covers from different countries, it would be a cool compare/contrast

      • I’m gonna suggest at least a good blog post to compare and contrast some of the multi-lingual awesomeness of the different covers, if it hasn’t been done already.

      • You should do a post showing the different covers and trying to explain why they’re the way they are.

      • You want Balls to the Wall? You want Heavy Metal?

        Predictions:
        You will not understand the words.
        You will not care in the awesomeness

        This ain’t amazon:

    • That there is the Zipper Buster 2000 Armor. That is an upgrade over the ZB 1000 in that you don’t know which zipper will break first… the female’s in the story, or the male observer’s.

      • The Leggy Love Monster #4

        I guess Czech air ambulances are green, blue and purple.

        Julie’s not in armor; that’s the undershirt that wicks away the sweat. The armor’s in the chopper. The undershirt is black because you don’t want to accidentally flash white during a wardrobe malfunction. The high collar is to get that nasty neck sweat wicked away. It’s flat desert with miles of visibility and it’s so hot that the rain is evaporating before it hits the ground (virga). Super hot and humid. The cloud cover means she can open up the front zipper to shed more heat without a sunburn.

        She’s modest, but it’s only Skippy, who is a great guy, but he doesn’t lust for humans. Skippy’s fully armored up because he’s hardcore and from Uzbekistan, so this is normal weather for him.

        It’s hot and the threat level doesn’t justify it wearing full body armor, or Skippy would be holding something shooty too. Heatstroke will slow your reactions or kill you by itself. Julie is dressed very sensibly for the situation.

        Show me cleavage and I can justify *anything*.

  4. “Love Monster” is all I see, and I can’t unsee it.

  5. Love the translation, and the new armor look, or lack there of. πŸ™‚

  6. I think that must be a low-gravity planet.

  7. What does it say about me that I noticed Skippy before I noticed the …er..armor?

  8. Darn, I was hoping for an ultra-high rez picture. Oh well.

  9. Treegar Varnings mit da titzenzies

  10. Cool artwork. Baen ought to consider hiring the Czech illustrator to do the covers for Larry’s US releases, actually.

    The fact that the over-the-top combination of militarism and sexiness is enough to cause Scalziite heads to explode is a bonus. πŸ˜›

  11. It’s a woman with a shotgun… how is that possibly sexist? As for the cleavage, I thought the feminist movement was all about women feeling comfortable in their own skins. “Liberation” and all that jazz…

    • It only counts as feminist when the feminists say it does.

      Remember, a woman attending a slutwalk in support of sluttiness is a good thing. But calling a woman a slut shows that you’re an insensitive chauvinist pig (unless you’re a woman, of course, which is apparently statistically more likely; that shows that you’re annoyed that she’s hanging out with a guy that you’ve got your eye on).

      πŸ˜›

      • Ah. That’s right. I was forgetting that only feminists are allowed to define, uh, hold on… Turns out I can’t define it, because I’m not a feminist.

        Is there a rulebook somewhere? I’d like to borrow it.

      • Wth is a slutwalk?

      • An opportunity for lots of women to parade around wearing “slut” signs and slutty clothing in broad daylight in an effort to demonstrate that sleeping around is nothing to be ashamed of. Oh, and it’s a response to a cop who once told them that dressing like sluts and walking alone, half drunk, through town in the middle of the night was a good way to get raped.

        Because walking in large groups, in broad daylight, cold sober, in front of hundreds of onlookers is *exactly the same*…

      • Hey, now! If you say, “Don’t go into that valley! It’s full of rattlesnakes!” You’re just victim blaming, OK? We all need to be more SUPPORTIVE!

      • Now, CombatMissionary, that was completely unfair to rattlesnakes.

        Slutwalks are yet another product of the left’s inability to grasp that not only is reality a harsh mistress, but she doesn’t recognize safe words.

        A woman should be able to dress (or un-dress, as the case may be) however she chooses and still retain the right to not be raped. However, if she does opt to kit herself out like a $10 whore, she does waive the rights:

        * not to be ogled
        * not to be propositioned
        * not to be called an idiot
        * not to be called a slut

        There was a whole earlier thread about how the way a man looks/dresses determines how others view and react to him. Same thing applies to women, though the slutwalkers don’t want to accept that. (They also don’t want to accept that if you have sex with a lot of men, you’re a slut — that’s what the word means. They don’t like being called sluts, but they’re not willing to stop /being/ sluts.)

      • Funny, my daughter once came home from school and talked about how her class had a lesson on not judging people based on appearances. “Isn’t that great, dad?”
        “Well, it depends. You know daddy worked as a cop for a while, right? We shouldn’t judge people based on their skin color. But what if a guy talks, dresses and acts like a violent gang member? Am I wrong to judge him and conclude that he probably is?”
        “No.”
        “You’re right. If I presume that people who look and act like violent thugs are really warm and cuddly, I could end up dead. So we shouldn’t judge people based on their skin color. But people are free to choose how they present themselves to the world. They’re NOT free to choose how the world will react to their appearance and what judgments the world will make.”

        My daughter understands this. How come feminists don’t? πŸ˜‰

    • It’s liberating for women to be hookers, porn stars and exotic dancers. It’s sexist for men to use the services of said hookers, porn stars and exotic dancers. Sandra Fluke is simply fighting for the future. In the future, the government will pay women to be hookers, porn stars and exotic dancers, and men WON’T be allowed to take advantage of their services. We mustn’t pollute the rites of femigyny moon worship, you know. We should just support them with our tax dollars.

      Sorry, did that come of as CISmale gendernormative fascism?

      • And I thought they were already supported by the non-tax dollars of men purchasing their services. I have so much to learn, master CombatMissionary.

        Anyway, these hookers, porn stars and exotic dancers of the future will be for female eyes and use only? Or will gays be allowed into these service establishments? I just need to know… for, uh, science, and possibly a lifestyle change in the future…

      • Well, as a purely academic exercise… by the time this comes to pass, I’m guessing you can be very vague about how non-cismale you are. But if there’s any evidence of cismale blasphemy, then you’ll be running the gauntlet, so to speak. Or trial by fire. Maybe it would be that eunuch test from Mel Brooks’ ‘History of the World.’ The one that got Gregory Hines in so much trouble.

  12. Babe with a big… superstructure, a Hind attack helicopter and assorted shotguns, that’s some serious sexist action right there.

    Larry, you have to find a way to work a chain-mail bikini into the next book. It just has to be done.

    • A Red Sonja cosplayer at a sci-fi/fantasy convention? I think I have a vague recollection of seeing one of those at Anime Expo a decade or so ago (bit of a surprise, actually, since chain mail bikinis tend to be a more Western thing).

      In a fictional novel, she could be an amateur. Or she could be a professional whose presence is supposed to promote an upcoming “barely clad female warrior in a fantasy setting” movie.

  13. “She’s got great big… tracts of land!”

    πŸ˜›

  14. Chainmail armor removal is like pulling velcro only with very painful results

    • This depends on if you’re not wearing a bit underneath it…which is what you’re s’posed to do, even if you’re going to rock a skimpy barbarian woman outfit. >:-D

  15. Quite a forward cover. πŸ™‚ It’s all good.

  16. This here is the USA so what I need to know is: how much are you charging for autographed covers?

  17. Why are we even worrying about the SF Wankers Assn? >:-D

  18. Nope we didn’t get the memo, we are here to enjoy your high-octane action. And you’ve started to build up quite the following here. Not like Mr. Weber, who was even here year before last at the biggest convention, but you have spent less time writing your books.
    Anyway, looking forward picking “Lovci monster Legie” from my bookstore and trying to get some more people to start to read your books. I just don’t have enough people to talk about your series yet.
    Thank you, Mr. Correia.

  19. I sure hope that shotgun is a Model 37, that’s all I’m sayin’.

  20. I’m trying to get my wife to buy an outfit a la Julie, Larry. She’s not going for it.

  21. What? No one has complained that her finger is on the trigger yet.

  22. Looks like my wife in the ’80s only less blonde and smaller uhm…howitzers.

  23. It looks like “Love Monster.” Heh. I didn’t know you were writing those kinds of books.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: